Pricing
Priced on the value it creates,
not the hours it takes
The fee tracks the value the automation creates for you — and every number comes out of the free audit, agreed in writing before anything is built.
How I price
The number isn't pulled from a rate card. It's built from what the problem is costing you — the ROI calculator gives you a rough version of that figure in a minute.
I quantify the problem first
In the free audit we work out what the manual version is costing you today — hours lost, errors, missed revenue, the hire you keep deferring — in your numbers, not mine.
The fee is a fraction of that value
Your price is a share of the first-year value the automation creates. Small enough that you see a clear multiple back — the target is 5–10× in year one — and never more than the value itself.
If it can't pay for itself, I tell you
When the audit shows the automation won't earn its cost back, you hear that straight, instead of getting sold a project that doesn't make sense.
What drives your number
These five things set the floor on what a build costs to deliver. The value it creates sets the ceiling. Your price sits between the two.
How many workflows or processes
Automating one clear process costs less than rebuilding how a whole department works. The scope of a build tracks the number of distinct workflows in it, not the hours.
How many systems need connecting
A workflow that touches your CRM and an inbox is simpler than one spanning a CRM, a database, a billing tool, and three SaaS APIs — each integration is design, auth, and error handling.
Data volume and how messy it is
Clean, structured data is quick to work with. Inconsistent records, PDFs with no fixed layout, and years of accumulated exceptions all take more work to handle reliably.
How autonomous the agents need to be
A workflow that drafts and waits for approval is faster to build and trust than one that takes actions end to end. More autonomy means more guardrails, testing, and monitoring.
Whether you want ongoing iteration
A one-off build is scoped and delivered. If you want continuous tuning, monitoring, and new workflows as they come up, that's a retainer rather than a project.
Every build proposal comes as three options
One price asks whether to work with me. Three ask how much of the outcome you want now.
Essential
Start hereThe smallest complete outcome: one priority workflow, one team, core integrations, launch support, and a 30-day review.
Growth
RecommendedMultiple connected workflows, broader edge-case testing, team training, and a 60-day optimisation window.
Scale
Broadest scopeMultiple teams, governance and reporting, higher-volume testing, an executive result dashboard, and a phased roadmap.
These are three sizes of outcome, not three prices for the same thing — the middle one is where most builds land.
How you pay
Milestone payments, tied to things you can point at.
Deposit at signing
A deposit reserves your build slot and funds discovery. Work starts once it's in.
Payments at tested milestones
The rest is split across objective checkpoints roughly a month apart — the proof of concept passes, then production goes live — each one something you can test before it's invoiced.
No hourly meter
No timesheets to audit, no open-ended invoices. You always know what's due and what has to be true for it to be due.
Ways to work together
The three-option proposal above is how a single build is structured. This is which kind of engagement fits you in the first place.
Fixed-scope build
You know what you want automatedA defined outcome, a fixed price, and a clear timeline. We scope it precisely in the audit, I build and test it, and you get documentation and a handover. Best when the process is well understood and the goal is concrete.
Monthly retainer
Automation is an ongoing programmeTwo different things under one label. Maintenance keeps the system you've built doing its agreed job — monitoring, and fixes when an API or model changes underneath it. A roadmap retainer is steady execution of a phased plan — new workflows built as you go, on top of keeping what's live healthy. Priced separately, because they're different scopes.
Advisory & audit
You have a team and want directionArchitecture review, tool and model selection, and a prioritised roadmap your people can execute. No build — just a clear view of what to do and in what order. Best when the capability is in-house but the plan isn't.
What every engagement includes
- Direct access to me — no account managers, no handoffs to a delivery team
- Full documentation and a proper handover, so nothing is a black box you can't maintain
- Everything runs on your infrastructure and your accounts — no lock-in to me or a platform
- A post-launch support window to fix anything that surfaces once the automation is running for real
- Production API and tool costs run on your own accounts — you pay providers directly, there's no markup, and I estimate them during scoping
- A baseline captured before launch, with the result measured at 30, 60, and 90 days against it
- Payment tied to milestones you can test, not a monthly retainer you can't predict
Pricing FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Why don't you list fixed prices?
How do you decide the price?
How does payment work?
Do you charge hourly?
What's the minimum engagement?
Do you do a smaller first project to start?
What if the automation doesn't deliver the value you projected?
What ongoing costs should I expect?
Do I need to know exactly what to automate?
Not sure what a build would cost?
The audit is free and ends with a fixed-scope proposal. No obligation to go ahead.